A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 6, 2018, around 14:50, the Defendant, at the end of Busan Gangseo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, 29 U.S., had a complaint about delayed confirmation, and at the front corridor of the upper floor of the Busan Metropolitan City B’s prison, had a complaint about the delayed confirmation, and at the same time, had a correctional officer C at the correctional officer level C, who is working on his job “Issing things immediately.”

I expressed the desire to "I amsia".

Accordingly, in order to investigate the Defendant’s disturbance, the defect that the C and C were about to move the Defendant to E office in order to take the Defendant’s disturbance, and the Defendant was quih to the Defendant’s hand, with the back head, and his chest was used, and the correctional officers used the protective equipment in E office, and assaulted the Defendant’s quih to the Defendant’s quih.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the confinement and management of the above correctional officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to F, C, and D;

1. G self-statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to any documentary evidence photograph (for example, part on the victim's upper part) and any investigation report (for example, attaching photographs to the upper part);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she was sentenced to imprisonment for a prison term of two years and six months due to murdering, etc., and committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she had been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the purpose of attempting to murder, etc., and committed the instant crime. The instant crime was committed by two correctional officers during the performance of his/her duties, thereby obstructing lawful performance of official duties by a correctional officer, who ought to be absolutely protected in order to establish a prison order in the prison. As such, disadvantageous circumstances, such as the fact that the nature of the instant crime is very poor and the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and that there is a great need to punish the instant crime, and that there is no record of punishment due to interference with the performance of official duties.