logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.26 2018나14433
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiffs' claims against the above revocation portion are all made.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the basic facts is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff’s rank G, which is the Plaintiff’s assertion commander, charged the deceased with an inappropriate position, unreasonable and inappropriate management, and took excessive interference with and control of the character insulting and female mound, verbal abuse, and privacy, and put unfair pressure on the deceased’s application for long-term service.

As a result, since the deceased committed suicide, it is claimed against the state for damages caused by illegal acts.

3. Determination

A. The provisions of the proviso of Article 2(1) of the State Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 2018, May 10, 2002; Act No. 20144, Feb. 11, 1992; Act No. 20144, Feb. 11, 2002; Act No. 2013, Feb. 2002; Act No. 20148, Feb. 11, 2002; Act No. 20135, Feb. 1, 2002; Act No. 2013, Apr. 1, 2002; Act No. 20130, Jan. 2, 2002; Act No. 20130, Jan. 2, 2005; Act No. 20130, Feb. 1, 201).

arrow