1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. On October 2, 1950, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion (the Plaintiff’s increase and decrease) died on Oct. 2, 1950 (hereinafter “N forest”) on the real estate indicated in the attached list (which refers to 3822m2 square meters of NU in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, and hereinafter “N forest”) and died on Sept. 25, 1975 (hereinafter “the network M”), and P succeeded to the family head and property of the deceased M solely by theO, but died on Sept. 25, 1975 (hereinafter “the network M”).

(hereinafter referred to as “the net P.”). The Plaintiff, as the heir of the deceased M, the networkO, and the network P, proceeded with the procedures for registration of preservation of ownership of N forest, and among the co-inheritors, as to the shares of co-inheritors in the above forest in the name of the Plaintiff, the registration of preservation of ownership of each co-owner’s shares in the corresponding column of each Defendant listed in the separate sheet in the name of the Defendants, including the completion of registration of preservation of ownership of the 1386/1453 of the co-owner’s shares in Q Q’s name.

However, according to the death of the deceased M, networkO, and network P in consecutive order, the property of the deceased M was succeeded to the R (the deceased P's spouse and died on May 10, 1987), the plaintiff and S were succeeded to each order, and even though the defendants were not entitled to legitimate inheritance of N forest, registration of preservation of ownership was completed due to the error of a certified judicial scrivener entrusted to the plaintiff.

Therefore, since the registration of preservation of ownership, which was completed with respect to the shares of co-owners in the corresponding column of each defendant listed in the separate sheet among N forest under the name of the Defendants, is null and void, the Defendants are obliged to implement the registration procedure for cancellation of each of the above registrations completed

B. Although there is no dispute between the parties that the registration of ownership preservation has been completed for each of the relevant shares of co-owners in the corresponding column of each Defendant listed in the separate sheet concerning N Forest in the name of the Defendants, each of the above registrations of ownership preservation in the name of the Defendants, such as the Plaintiff’s assertion.