Text
1. The Defendants: (a) KRW 102,00,000 for each Plaintiff and 5% per annum from June 30, 201 to January 8, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff Company is a company that manufactures, produces, and sells concrete saws, “Stosaw concrete bed,” and “the core parts of tools that cover luminous,” and Defendant B entered the Plaintiff Company on August 25, 2003 and were in general in charge of overseas trade-related affairs as the deputy head of the Trade Department. On September 1, 2001, Defendant C retired from the Plaintiff Company on July 30, 2008 while the Plaintiff Company was employed as the deputy head of the Trade Department and was in general in charge of the production of products. The said Defendants were currently in joint representative position as Defendant D (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).
B. Around 2007, the Plaintiff Company completed the mixing ratio of metal materials (one name 'BOND'), and as a result, the Plaintiff Company growing up to 5.1 million won per annum to a foreign purchasing company, including the United States E company, to a foreign purchasing company.
C. From March 3 to 4, 2008, Defendant C stored “BOND” ledgers, small conditions, work instructions, and the current status of business partners stored on computers in the Plaintiff Company’s office (hereinafter “the instant principal register, etc.”) in the personal mobile storage device and stored them, Defendant C retired from the Plaintiff Company on July 30, 2008, and had the aforementioned materials as they were, and Defendant B established the Defendant Company as the same company with the Plaintiff Company on September 19, 2008, and produced Damond products by establishing the Defendant Company as the same company with the Plaintiff Company, and then exported products of KRW 10,591,406,655 on June 30, 201 to obtain a net profit of KRW 376,587,565 on June 30, 2011.
Prosecution's office on June 29, 2012
On February 1, 2013, the court of first instance sentenced Defendant C to one year of suspended sentence, two years of suspended sentence, and two years of suspended sentence as to Defendant B, respectively (this Court Decision 2012No. 745).
The above Defendants and the prosecutor appealed against the judgment of the first instance court, but they filed an appeal.