The defendant's KRW 52,00,000 and its relation to the plaintiff shall be 6% per annum from December 23, 2017 to August 2, 2019.

1. At the time of permitting the basic facts, the production and sale business of the mountain and eggs was engaged in the name of “D farm” in the wife population C

E decided on September 2015 to newly construct three guidances by phase, and entered into an entrustment contract with F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “entrusted breeding company”) on October 5, 2015 to entrust the raising of pathology to the entrusted breeding company from November 16, 2015 to February 4, 2016.

E, on October 29, 2015, entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to be supplied with mutual guidance (hereinafter “first contract”) from the Plaintiff, and agreed to receive the said case from the Plaintiff from December 3, 2015.

E established the defendant on November 12, 2015 for the purpose of producing and selling the mountain and eggs.

On February 2, 2016, the Plaintiff completed the supply of walks under the first contract.

On July 29, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a contract on August 2016, 2016 with the Defendant for 690 million won (a down payment of KRW 114 billion on August 16, 2016; the first container payment of KRW 100 million on September 27, 2016; the second container payment of KRW 100 million on October 27, 2016; the third container payment of KRW 136 million on November 30, 2016; and the third container payment of KRW 240 million on November 30, 2016; and the remaining amount of KRW 240 million on March 7, 2017 to the repayment of KRW 20 million on monthly installments (hereinafter referred to as “the second container payment”).

In accordance with the second contract, the Plaintiff set up a walk at a place designated by the Defendant, and was paid by the Defendant the remainder, excluding KRW 52 million, out of the proceeds under the second contract.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts, according to the judgment on the cause of the claim, the defendant is the plaintiff with the remaining amount of KRW 52 million under the second contract and the payment date therefor.