A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Definite Defendant: (a) on June 30, 2018, on the street in front of “D” located in Busan District, Busan District; (b) on the street in front of “D” in the main place of business and the drinking value test expenses; and (c) on the E District border border, called up after receiving a report and being called up to 112, the Defendant is against the victim F by the main place of business and the customer. The Defendant is equally hind with “definite, hind,” respectively.

h. In the same case, there are different cases.

Nyer test is so called ‘A', thereby openly insulting the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time, at the place, and at the time, paragraph 1, and at the place, the above slope F was required to present a police officer’s certificate and to disclose the Defendant’s identity, and thereby interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reporting 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F, G, and H;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution of public duties (the degree of interference with the execution of public duties has not been serious).