logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2021.01.13 2020나2010815
물품대금
Text

All appeals filed by both the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne individually by each person.

The purport of the claim and the appeal shall be 1.

Reasons

1. The grounds for admitting and amending the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the first instance judgment was used as follows. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary parts] around July 5, 2016, “B” around July 23, 2016, following the first instance judgment’s 8 Myeon 1 and 13 Myeon 19.

The portion of the first instance judgment’s award is immediately given on December 31, 2015, 2015, excluding the period from July 6, 2016 to July 12, 2016 (from January 6, 2016 to July 12, 2016) during which the Plaintiff was not liable, and the number of days of 187 days (from January 1, 2016 to July 5, 2016 to July 5, 2016) excluding the period from July 13, 2016 to July 23, 2016.

The judgment of the first instance court No. 10, 16, 2016, i.e., 10, 2016. Dec. 20, 2016; and ii. iii1, 2015, i.e., i., December 21, 2016.

The judgment of the court of first instance is 14, 17, and 15, 2015, 31, 2015, 14, 17, 15, 2016, 1, 2016.

Section 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance (No. 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance) shall be raised as follows:

The Defendant supplied the instant power generator around July 23, 2016, which was the date the Plaintiff supplied, on December 31, 2015, the date of the supply. The period from July 6, 2016 to July 12, 2016 during the period from July 6, 2016 to the date of the final supply, deeming that there is no reason to return to the Plaintiff, and calculated the number of days of delay as 187 days from January 1, 2016 to July 5, 2016 (11 days from July 13, 2016 to July 23, 2016).

The plaintiff asserts to the purport, and if the plaintiff is held liable to delay to the plaintiff at the third pleading date of the appellate trial, the defendant's assertion is recognized as to the calculation method of the number of days in delay and the number of days in delay is 198 days.

“I stated to the purport.”

The judgment of the court of first instance on July 5, 2015, "No. 15 Myeon 9"

arrow