logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.19 2019나54681
토지인도
Text

The judgment of the first instance court is modified as follows. A.

The defendant shall be the plaintiff and attached Form 2. from among the land listed in the attached Table 1 List.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the facts of recognition is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Determination

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this part of the claim for removal, delivery, and taking place is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (from the 8th to 11th day of the judgment of the first instance), “a determination on the cause for claim”, “4) “a determination on the claim”, and “a determination on the claim for the portion” and “5th day” as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following cases. Thus, the above determination on the ground for the claim is as follows. [1] According to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, barring any special circumstance, the defendant, who is the landowner, removed the portion of “A”, “B”, “C”, “A”, “B”, “C”, “Ma”, “Ma”, “M”, and “a determination on the size of the land on the Plaintiff’s land that he/she occupied by the Defendant, and thus, the Defendant is not obliged to accept the Plaintiff’s claim for removal of the G-M and the part on the ground (No No. 4).

arrow