logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.12 2015가합17086
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On January 1, 2010, H (hereinafter “H”) opened an emergency conference on January 18, 2010 to take part in the emergency relief of the Plaintiff’s former organization and the external organization of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “F”) with a view to suffering significant damage due to the strong dust near 13 km in the water supply I, and delegated the work of H relief fund and enforcement related to the strong damage relief project (hereinafter “the instant project”), etc. under the Plaintiff’s control.

Defendant C was delegated with the authority to organize a specific organization by the Relief Committee, and he was in charge of general affairs, Defendant D was in charge of the working members, and Defendant B was in charge of the working members.

On February 17, 2010, the Relief Policy Committee selected F as a partner of the instant business and made mutual cooperation among its members at the fourth meeting of the 4th meeting (the working-level meeting). Defendant D was working for F as the chief executive officer, Defendant C as a standing director (registration director), and Defendant B as the chief executive officer.

On February 4, 2010, the payment date of the budget bill Nos. 30,00,000 air charges, ten hundred,00,000 medical expenses, and three H 190,000,000 H 3 H 190,706,200 on March 19, 2010: (a) on June 14, 2010; (b) on June 28, 2010, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to provide the total budget of KRW 30,00,000 for the travel expenses for the H 15,901,605,605,2096 goods and machinery purchase expenses; (c) on June 28, 2010; (d) on June 29, 2010, the Plaintiff paid KRW 30,000,000 to the Plaintiff as well as KRW 30,038,04,000.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleading is due to the plaintiff's joint tort.

arrow