logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.03.26 2018고단5281
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 5281] On November 17, 2018, the Defendant, while working in the Busan High-gu Busan High-gu C hotel D, received a report of suspicion of drunk driving to himself, and the police officers called out, was aware that he was hiding in the boiler room of the above hotel. On the same day, around 18:15 on the first floor of the above hotel, the Defendant, who was requested F to take a test of drinking alcohol from a police officer working in the Busan High-gu Police Station E Zone E-gu, Busan High-gu, and was able to take a bath, such as “I see, Chewing, I see, I see, I see, I am, I am, and I am, I am.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

[2019 Highest 307] On November 5, 2018, the Defendant driven a vehicle of HK3 from the Busan High-gu Busan High-gu Ga to the C hotel, and moved from the above B hotel parking lot to the front and rear on several occasions, and entered the B hotel room.

On the same day, at around 17:31, the Defendant received 112 report that “A son son her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers

From 19:08 to 19:29 on the same day, the Defendant was demanded to comply with the alcohol alcohol measurement by inserting approximately 20 minutes in a drinking measuring instrument three-minutes in the Busan Jin-gu District E zone of the Busan Jin-gu Police Station.

Nevertheless, the defendant was avoided by refusal, and the defendant did not comply with the drinking test by a police officer without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 5281]

1. The defendant;

arrow