logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.12.23 2015고단7020
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B From April 1, 2015, from around Incheon Ctel 206, 307, 406, 506, and 508, as a business owner operating commercial sex acts under the trade name of "D", he/she manages the profits by taking overall charge of the arrangement of commercial sex acts, and the defendant works as the head of the business office from April 1, 2015, and manages the reservation receipt, guidance, and the website of commercial sex acts while working as the head of the business office, and E has recruited from June 17, 2015 to receive reservations, provide guidance, and provide visitors to the business office.

The Defendant and B and E offered as above, from two male customers who visited a business establishment around July 21, 2015 to receive KRW 90,000 per capita in return for sexual traffic, and paid KRW 50,000 among them to female employees. The Defendant and B and E provided, as an officetel 206 with female employees F, and as an officetel 508 with female employees G, arranged sexual intercourse, etc. from April 1, 2015 to July 21, 2015.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol concerning B, E, G, or F;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The sentencing criteria shall not be applied as a fine is selected for the crime in the judgment.

2. Although it is not easy for the Defendant to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic in collusion, the degree of participation is minor compared to his accomplices, the Defendant recognizes and reflects the crime, and the Defendant has no power except for one-time suspension of indictment in 2015.

arrow