logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.06.24 2016고정318
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who C is engaged in driving a car in C.

On November 3, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 16:05, and proceeded ahead of the “E” restaurant located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, at a speed of about 30 km in the direction of the red-interest University at a speed of about 30 km in the direction of the city elementary school.

At this point, a one-way road that can proceed exclusively in the direction of the red-interest University at an elementary school in the direction of the Western elementary school, where people have a large access to the house and the restaurant, and the width of the road was narrow due to the passage of the vehicles parked on the said road at the time. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle, such as reducing the speed and accurately operating the steering direction and the brake system, and prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving along a one-way restaurant as above while driving along it, took part of the right side part of the victim F (28 Do) who opened the above cafeteria, and got off the part of the victim F (28 Do) with the right side part of the Defendant’s vehicle. The victim suffered an injury, such as light salt, which requires treatment for about two weeks, but failed to immediately stop and stop and escape without taking measures such as aiding the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. G statements;

1. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) a medical certificate (as at the time of the accident in this case, the victim was treated by the hospital on the following day; (b) the victim continued to receive treatment; and (c) there are still pains, it can be acknowledged that the victim was injured in this accident.

In addition, after the accident of this case, the injured person "whether or not the injured person has laid down a person or not."

“ even though they speak to the effect that they were:

arrow