logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2014.04.22 2014고단122
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. From January 21, 1992, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the branch office of the Industrial Bank of Korea and the Defendant from January 21, 1992, and has traded the check number table.

On May 30, 201, the Defendant issued one check number “C”, the check amount “150,000,000,000,” and the date of issuance “11, 30, 2015,” in the name of the Defendant at port of South-gu, South-gu, the Defendant issued one check number per bank.”

On June 20, 2013, the holder of the said check presented the payment proposal to the Bank of Korea on June 20, 2013.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

2. Judgment: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act (Article 2 (4) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act).

arrow