Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On December 26, 2011, the Defendant revised the contract amount to “275,00,000,000, out of the terms of the standard contract for private construction works related to “G construction works” entered into between the contractor F and the contractor E Co., Ltd., which were stored in the office computer without authority for the purpose of exercising, as “275,00,000,000,” “ September 1, 201,” and the contractor column “(P) Ha, E, E, and then forged one copy of the standard contract for private construction works under the name of the contractor F, which is a private document on rights and duties, by sealing the seal of the contractor F at his own discretion on the name of the contractor F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the J;

1. The prosecutor's statement to K;

1. Statement of each police statement about F and L;

1. Application of the standard contract for private construction works, certified copy of resident registration certificate, F, business registration certificate (F), electronic tax invoice, request for progress payment, copy of the contract for private construction works, and the detailed statement and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 231 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant and his defense counsel, as well as this court’s attitude of recognizing and opposing the facts charged, did not change significantly in the investigation process. The investigation agency, consistently with the investigation agency, went beyond the responsibilities of the private document of this case, causing considerable mental damage to the court, including mental damage, and borrowing the name of the H from J while the E company, which it actually operated, has already closed its business, is hidden to the contractor, and the reasons for concluding the contract with the E company under the above E company’s name, and the forgery of the standard contract of this case, was not delayed.