A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Criminal facts

The defendant is subject to call-up to social work personnel service, and the defendant is in his/her residence, which is located in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on June 7, 2016.

7.1. The notice of call-up to social work personnel service in the name of the director of the regional military manpower office in the name of the person in charge of the former North Korea, to be called as the 35 Assistant Soldiers in the name of the office of the former North Korea; and

However, the defendant did not enlist in the military after the lapse of three days from the date of call without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the current status of registration delivery;

1. The reasoning for judgment and sentencing on the Defendant’s assertion regarding criminal facts under Article 88(1)2 of the pertinent Act regarding the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant refuses military service according to one’s conscience formed by his religious doctrine as a new witness. As such, this constitutes “justifiable cause” for refusing military service under the main sentence of Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act.

The freedom of false conscience and religion should be guaranteed to the maximum constitutional right, which is the most fundamental right associated with the mental domain of human beings.

However, if the freedom of conscience or the freedom of religion is simply expressed in the territory of the human body and conflicts with other constitutional values, it cannot be said that the freedom of conscience is always guaranteed on the ground that it is related to the mental area.

Furthermore, it is the basic limitation of the exercise of all fundamental rights, including freedom of conscience and freedom of religion, that the exercise of fundamental rights under the Constitution makes it possible for people to live a community with others within a state community, and should be done within the scope that does not endanger other constitutional values or the legal order of the state.

Therefore, the freedom of conscience and religion can be restricted by law in accordance with Article 37(2) of the Constitution if there is a constitutional legal interest to justify the restriction.