A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

【Amount of the charge】 The history of the crime

1. The Defendant entering a residence is in a relationship with the victim C’s mother D.

On May 30, 2015, at around 21:55, the Defendant entered a multi-household house where the victim C (n, 20 years of age) was living in Suwon-si E, Suwon-si, and went into the front of the entrance of the first floor where the victim was living.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties of the police officer by using violence, such as franchising the police officer’s chest, franchising the police officer’s chest, franchising the police officer’s chest, franchising the police officer’s chest, franchising the police officer’s chest, and booming the police officer’s chest at the above time and at the above place, and obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement of C and G;

1. 112 Notification to a department related to the report of the case;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentence shall be imposed as ordered in consideration of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act, the background of the offense by the defendant, the relationship between the defendant and the victim, the violence committed by the defendant against the police officer and the degree of interference with official business due to such violence, circumstances after the crime was committed (the victim police officer complained against the police officer), the criminal records of the defendant (the victim has been punished due to violence, non-compliance with the eviction, etc., but there is no record of punishment exceeding the

[Dismissal of the public prosecution] On May 30, 2015, the defendant was dispatched to the public prosecutor's office upon receipt of a report that the defendant intruded into a multi-household in Suwon-si E, Suwon-si, and that D's child C (V, 20 years of age) who is in a relationship with him/her.