A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 1, 2020, the Defendant assaulted on one occasion the left side and back side of the above police box D on the ground that the police box belonging to the coastwise C police station in the port north of the port where the Defendant was called the Defendant, after receiving a report on the visit of the taxi engineer aboard at the port north-gu B at around 01:05, on the ground that the police box belonging to the coastwise C police station in the port where the Defendant was called the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with labor for one month to five years;

2. Scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines / [type 1] Interference in the performance of official duties on the grounds of a crime interfering with the performance of official duties / [No person subject to special sentencing] [the territory of recommendations and the scope of the recommended punishment] basic area, six months through one year and six months.

3. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months, 2 years of suspended sentence, 2 years of suspended sentence, and circumstances after the crime was committed; however, the Defendant’s age, career, background of the crime, and history of criminal punishment were considered.