1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on September 8, 2010, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on December 2, 2014.

Meanwhile, from February 21, 2012 to April 21, 2012, the Plaintiff visited Pakistan.

B. On December 9, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including virtual number), Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. In around 2007, the Plaintiff’s assertion made a purchase of the land located in Pakistan from 4 Goomo-Mad, and the Plaintiff’s use of the land threatens the Plaintiff and their families.

In the event that the plaintiff returns to Pakistan, there is a well-founded fear of persecution from the third village due to the above dispute, and thus, the plaintiff constitutes a refugee.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by adding the above facts to the entries in the evidence Nos. 3 and 5 and the purport of the entire pleadings, even if all of the evidence presented by the Plaintiff and the circumstances alleged by this court are considered, it is insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff has a “sufficient fear of persecution” as a requirement for refugee status, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and thus, the disposition of this case, which rejected the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status, cannot be deemed unlawful.

1. The plaintiff asserts.