The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the accused recognizes and reflects the instant crime; (b) the recipient of basic livelihood security; and (c) the health of the accused is not good.

2. In full view of the following factors: (a) there was no agreement between the victims of the judgment; (b) there was a history of having been punished several times for the same crime; (c) the Defendant was absent and his whereabouts became unknown; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, the circumstances and consequence of the instant crime; and (c) all of the sentencing conditions as indicated in the instant argument, such as the circumstances after the instant crime, even if considering the circumstances of the Defendant’s assertion, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.