1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 13, 2013, the Plaintiff’s spouse (hereinafter “the deceased”) was on the part of the vehicle driven by a business owner operating the water surface called “C” in Sejong Special Self-Governing City, and was on duty at Sejong Special Self-Governing City. On July 29, 2015, the Plaintiff’s spouse died as the suspension of the first instance trial on July 23, 2015, when the Defendant was under medical treatment with the approval of the medical care for the approved injury and disease.

Approved Injury Disease: Non-approved Injury Disease of Other Two Alleys: Non-approval of the opening frame of the two floors, Madropooping of external wounded one, Madrooping of external wounded one with no open address, Madrooping of the two floors, Madrooping of the inner and the floor, Madroping of the complex surface, Madroping of the upper part of the upper part of the center, Madroping of the upper part of the left part of the center, Madroop of the upper part of the center, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “instant injury and disease”): Madroop of the light being missing in detail or by the

B. On August 24, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for the payment of bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff was receiving treatment for the instant injury and disease caused by the instant accident, which led to a diversity long-term injury and died.

C. On September 18, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the effect that it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation between the injury and death of the injury and the injury, on the following grounds: (a) the acute brain color, which was approved by the king for the Plaintiff, overall due to the brain side of the left-hand brain; and (b) aggravated and aggravated as a result of the cerebral dystrophy; and (c) thus, it is presumed that

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, 11, and 12, and the purport of the whole pleadings.