1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and all of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Defendant Hospital” in Part 7 of Part 2 【Defendant Hospital’s 【Defendant Hospital” (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”).

The second page "qui hand" of the 8th parallel is considered to be "moqui hand change".

Part 2, the term "actual damage" in Part 18 shall be changed to "actual import damage".

Part II "72,405,862 won" in Part 19 shall be "72,405,862 won".

Part 3, Paragraph 6 of the same Article, "the local species of this case" shall be "the local species of this case" (hereinafter referred to as "the local species of this case").

Part 3 ¥§ 11. anesthesia

D. “A” of the operating intensity is deemed to be “A” of anesthesia and the surgery intensity C. 3rd 14 (hereinafter referred to as “the instant anesthesia”).

“” means “the instant anesthesia treatment”

- - 15 to 16 on the 3rd - the operation of this case.

“Abstin, hereinafter referred to as “the instant operation”).

3) Each party shall be deemed to have entrusted the examination of the medical records to the head of the Seoul Hospital at the time of the first instance court’s request for the examination of the medical records on the head of the Seoul Hospital at the time of the first instance court’s request for the examination of the medical records. 5th party’s request for the examination of the medical records on the head of the Seoul Hospital at the time of the first instance court’s request for the examination of the records. 5th party’s request for the examination of the records is as follows. 3th party’s request for the examination of the records. 4th party’s request for the examination of the records. 6th party’s request for the examination of the records on the Seoul Hospital at the time of the first instance court’s request for the examination of the records on the head of the Seoul Hospital at the time of the first instance court’s request for the examination of the records on the head of the Seoul Hospital at the time of the first instance court’s request for examination of the records.