1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as annual 6% from February 18, 2017 to July 6, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 10, 2016, the Plaintiff sought to purchase Category 1 of the Faccination (name faccination) from the Defendant. However, on the grounds that the Defendant did not stock the said medicine, the Plaintiff sought an explanation from the Defendant that he would substitute Category 1 of the same ingredient as the spination chemical (name faccinaccin), spinate 2 (Vaccin), and spinate 1 (name faccin), and then spread after mixing the spination chemical (name faccin), and purchase the said Category 4 medicine from the Defendant at KRW 15,800.

B. On September 20, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) around 14,184 square meters in Jeju-si, Jeju-do, and distributed the instant four-class medicine by mixing the instant four-class medicine with the brocin brocin brocin brocin.

C. After spraying as above, the Plaintiff resisted to the Defendant that “the brocin brocule caused a weak damage to the situation where the brocule was the horse.”

The Plaintiff and the Defendant, together with the F of the Manufacturing Enterprise E and the Supplier E, did not cause damage to the drug in the agricultural product reproduction test conducted on October 24, 2016 and November 3, 2016.

E. The Plaintiff requested the Defendant to have the Plaintiff carry out an agrochemical reproduction test at the same time when the Plaintiff’s weak damage occurred, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant re-examineed the test at around September 20, 2017.

F. On September 22, 2017, the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) taken a test for spraying agricultural chemicals; (b) taken photographs whenever 5, 40 days, and 50 days elapsed; and (c) viewed the normal form of broding after 50 days.

G. On September 29, 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that, on the part of a seed that had been in the test for spraying agrochemicals under the above paragraph (f) of the same paragraph, there was a weak damage to a seed phenomenon, and that, on the other hand, the Western Agricultural Technology Center G instructor decided to request the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Agricultural Technology Institute to provide an abnormal consulting on the abnormal diagnosis of the relevant pesticide spread.

On September 29, 2017, the Korea Agricultural Technology Institute collected samples, and thereafter prepared and notified a report (No. 2) with the following contents after undergoing the reproduction test of agricultural chemicals: