logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.11.21 2019고단3086
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The facts charged are between the victim B (V, 58 years old) and the married couple.

1. On April 21, 2019, at the defendant's house located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C apartment D around 13:00, the defendant told that the victim, who had been aware of having been accommodated in the hotel by going to the inside female and E, was able to talk with the defendant in a deep range without any day at the hotel. On the other hand, the victim was able to walk up two to three times the victim's bridge by walking the victim's bridge at the time when the victim was her "Idi panty".

2. 피고인은 2019. 5. 6. 14:30경 제1항과 같은 장소에서, 피해자가 피고인에게 초등학교 동문 골프모임에 내연녀와 함께 참석한 것을 알고 이를 묻던 중 피고인이 총무핑계를 댔고 이에 피해자가 골프모임 총무에게 전화해서 내연녀와 동행한 경위에 대해 대화하는 것을 듣다 화가나 양손으로 피해자의 목을 졸랐고 그곳에 있던 딸 F이 이를 말리자 다시 피해자를 안방으로 끌고 가 피해자의 목을 다시 졸랐으며, 거실에 있던 저울을 들고 와 피해자의 머리를 때리려 위협하는 등으로 피해자를 폭행하였다.

2. Crimes of non-compliance with judgment: Judgment dismissing a victim's complaint on June 11, 2019, which was after the prosecution was instituted pursuant to Article 260 (3) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow