logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2020.04.29 2018가단220641
손해배상(기)
Text

1. On March 2018, 2018, the Defendant paid to Plaintiff A KRW 31,831,550, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E each amount of KRW 1,00,000 and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 23, 2017, Plaintiff A entered into a contract to purchase the I apartment and Jho-ho (hereinafter “instant apartment”) from Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer in its name on March 7, 2018.

Plaintiff

B The spouse, the plaintiff C, D, and E are children of the plaintiff A and B.

B. The Defendant is the owner of the Kho Lake’s exclusive ownership adjoining the instant apartment.

C. The Plaintiffs planned remodeling interior works from March 7, 2018 before moving into the instant apartment, and discovered that the instant apartment floor part among the said construction works was flooded. On March 16, 2018, the Defendant joining the Defendant, via the Defendant’s Intervenor, who was a contractor, confirmed that this was caused by water leakage from the Defendant’s common bath pipes for apartment.

Since April 29, 2018, the Rotterdam Corporation was completed on April 29, 2018, the Plaintiffs were residing in the apartment of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and 6 (each number is included), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the fact that the defendant's liability for damages was acknowledged, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the defects in installation and preservation due to the leakage of the bathing rooms of Kho Apartment apartment owned by him in accordance with Article 758 of the Civil Act.

B. 1) Recognition of KRW 28,828,00 equivalent to the cost of construction caused by flooding: In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the appraisal entrustment by this court, Plaintiff A requested removal works, etc. to LA and M due to inundation, and thereby, required KRW 3,121,40,540 for removal and waste cost, KRW 41,540 for removal and waste cost, KRW 20,786,058 for other repair cost, KRW 24,319,000 for other repair cost, and KRW 1,70,513, and KRW 338,487 for extension due to the extension of construction period, KRW 4,550 for other repair cost, and KRW 24,319,000 for interior work originally planned.

arrow