1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 14, 2016, at around 04:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance over about 90 minutes in the manner that the victim C b was boomed with a swine boomed, operated by the victim C in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and the customers seated next to the Defendant, “hicking, booming,” and raising time fees, etc.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, who was sent to the D District Police Officers E, etc. upon receipt of a report at a time and place as referred to in paragraph 1, and asked the personal information of the D District Police Officers E, etc., to “I see the same and a series of mulberrys; or

Along with the marith of marith, the marith of marith, frith of E, frith of ma, frith of ma, and frith of E, frith of eth of eth of ma.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement statutes to E and C;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

4. Violation of Article 62-2(1), main sentence of Article 62-2(2), Article 59 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Monitoring, etc. of Community Service and Order to Attend Education [the scope of recommended punishment] : Violation of Article 1 of the Act on the Grounds of Punishment of Crimes (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) : Violation of Article 2 of the Act on the Grounds of Suspension of Performance of Official Duties (Obstruction of Performance of Duties) : Violation of Article 1 of the Act on the Grounds of Punishment of Specific Crimes (Obstruction of Duties) : Violation of Article 2 of the Act on the Grounds of Suspension of Performance of Official Duties . [the scope of recommended punishment ...................) [the scope of punishment ..........] Violation of Article 1 of the Act on the Protection, Observation of Community Service and Order to Attend Education ......