beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 36,327,575 to the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from May 1, 2016 to June 20, 2017.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff is a company engaged in a special co-rating manufacturing business, etc., and the Defendant is a company engaged in gold-making and design business.
B. Around April 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the processing and supply of products (i) with the Defendant, provided by the Defendant with HG 15MY FYOB KEY products, and crating the said products on the said products (hereinafter “instant hosting products”).
3) The contract under which the Defendant will deliver to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant contract for processing”).
(2) On May 21, 2014, the instant hosting products began to be supplied to the Defendant from May 21, 2014. 2) The instant hosting products are classified into 3rd and 4rd joints according to the number of pressings, which are the external form of a string roll, used on a vehicle, and 3rd joints are divided into 3rd joints, 3rd joints, 3rd joints, 3rd joints, 4rd joints, 4rd joints, 4rd joints, 4rd joints, 4rd joints, 4rd joints, 00 UPPPERS, 3/4rd joints, and BUTON.
3. In relation to the calculation of the unit price of the instant hosting products, at the time of the conclusion of the instant contract with the Defendant, the Plaintiff agreed to supply the instant hosting products on the basis of KRW 1,740,40, and KRW 1,985, as indicated in the “unit price” column as it is difficult for the Defendant to compute the accurate Gacing product, as it was before the price negotiation for the automobile strawls which was produced by the Defendant by assembling the instant hosting products supplied by the Plaintiff, was conducted between the e-mail that supplies the automobile strawls. Accordingly, the Plaintiff agreed to pay the difference between the fixed unit price and the provisional unit price retroactively from the time of delivery to the time of delivery, and accordingly, the Plaintiff agreed to pay the Defendant the difference as indicated in the table from May 20 to 2016.