1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, except in the case where the first to the fifth to the second to the second to the fourth to the judgment of the court of first instance, and as such, the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first to the second to the second to the contrary is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first to the contrary. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance

2. On the other hand, the Defendant alleged to have asserted that the limits of the cost of sale introduction are violated as follows. (1) At the time of concluding the first contract for sale introduction, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff the sales commission equivalent to 2% of the purchase price, and separately paid 2 million won of the sales presentation cost. The payment limit of the sale presentation cost is set as 1/2 of the total number of households to be sold (734%) 734,000,000 (734 units x 2 million won x 1/2), and the purport of which is to limit the sales commission to 1,00,000 won per 1 unit where the sales commission was actually sold (Articles 9 and 13 of the first contract for sale promotion). (2) After concluding the contract for sale as a sales agency with the Plaintiff, the Defendant still revised the first sale commission agreement with the Plaintiff to 90,000 won per 1,000 won per 1,000,0000 won.