logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.22 2017고단788
사기방조
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who runs a public entertainment bar in charge.

On September 2015, 2015, the Defendant received a phone call from a person who was killed in the name of the Defendant (afinite employee) and notified the Defendant of the account number (D) of a corporate bank account number. On October 20, 2015, the Defendant directly withdrawn the money deposited in the Defendant’s corporate bank account from the Defendant’s corporate bank account in cash to another person designated by the said person without his name.

Although the defendant knew that the money remitted by the victims to the above account of the defendant was deposited in the above account of the defendant, the defendant did not want to withdraw the above money to the above person's name.

On October 14, 2015, the person who was infinites sent letters to the victim E's mobile phone number as if he misrepresented the agricultural cooperative and made a loan at low interest.

This victim assumes it as “CF and G” and, in the event of repayment of existing secured loans with a loan from a savings bank, can be extended from NAF to NAF and NA.

In a false manner, the term “I” and “Ish Lbnsh” received loans from us and remitted money to our account designated by us at an annual interest rate of 50,000,000 won after handling the full payment.

However, the above-mentioned person was not a G of the Agricultural Cooperative F, and there was no intention or ability to raise credit reputation by making full payment of the loans that the victim received with the above money, or to provide low-interest loans from the Agricultural Cooperative.

Nevertheless, on October 20, 2015, the above-mentioned person had the victim transfer KRW 20,000,000 to the above-mentioned corporate bank account of the defendant around 12:38, 2015.

On October 20, 2015, the Defendant, despite being aware of the transfer of the above money to the above account of the Defendant, withdrawn money from the person under his name, even though he had been aware of the fact that the money was transferred by the above singing method.

arrow