Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

By January 2015, the Defendant worked as the director of the Mutual Growth Team division E (State) and performed duties such as contact with public officials in charge of the case, response to the violation of the Act on the Purification of Subcontracting (hereinafter “subcontract”) reported to the Fair Trade Commission, including submission of explanatory materials.

F From the end of July 2013, as a public official G and affiliated with the Fair Trade Commission from the end of July 2013, the F discovered the illegal act of unfair subcontracting transactions, etc. prescribed in the subcontract law, and conducted the investigation thereof.

F, around April 2014, when taking charge of the case of unfair subcontract transactions with E (State) around April 2014, the F investigated the person E (State), the director of the Foreign Contract Team, etc., and the Defendant said on July 30, 2014 to the effect that the Government Office of the Fair Trade Commission in the case of the special autonomy of Sejong Special Self-Governing Province would cause the accused to be informed of the suspicion of E (state).

F around September 15, 2014, around E (State) took a non-suspected measure against E (State) case, and notified the Defendant of the decision of suspicion and provided the Defendant with various convenience, such as informing the Seoul Special Metropolitan City of the fact that he notified the result of the instant case to his cell phone around October of the same year.

1. Around October 2, 2014, the Defendant agreed to give a bribe to the effect that F will register I (State) operated by F as E (State)’s cooperation entity at the non-commercial coffee shop located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (a) and (b) the F would have consented to the registration and sent H the name of H (State).

Accordingly, the Defendant made an illegal solicitation to F to the effect that the above case is well dealt with and various conveniences are different from the public official's duties, and promised to provide F with the pecuniary benefits of the partner's registration in I (State).

2. The Defendant offers a bribe to F in Seoul, a week around the day set forth in the above 1, deals well with the case of unfair subcontract transactions involving E (State).