Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. Performance of official duties;

A. At around 00:50 on August 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 200:50, the C District Party received a check from E during which he was serving as a taxi engineer D and taxi fare issues; (b) and (c) expressed the desire to “Ye, e.g., f., e., f., f., e., f., f., e., f., e., f., e., f., e., f., e., f., e., f., e., e., f., e., e., f., e., e., f., e., e., f., e.

B. The Defendant of the Daejeon Central Police Station is above A.

When a person was arrested in the act of committing the crime of paragraph (1) and the police officer was transferred to the criminal office and office of the Daejeon Middle Police Station around 03:40 on the same day, the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by assaulting the police officer, such as assaulting the E by drinking the person first time.

2. The defendant is insulting 1. A.

When interfering with the performance of official duties of E during the time and place specified in the port, the victim FGH, who is a police officer belonging to the C district group, who is a police officer belonging to the C district group, made a public insult of the victims by saying, “Ie frith, Ie frith, Ie frith, Ieth, criminal or well-fashion, I am.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes (with respect to the offense of insultment)

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the nature of the crime is not good in light of the frequency of the crime committed against a large number of police officers with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, it is the initial crime, and it is seriously against it.