logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.20 2016나57436
보험금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is as follows: (a) the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the first instance, except where “each entry” was stated in the third page 15 of the judgment of the first instance and the “the result of the request for the appraisal of medical records with respect to the head of the Aju University Hospital of this Court”; and (b)

2. If so, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 10,00,000 won and damages for delay at each rate of 15% per annum under the same Act and the amended provisions after the date of occurrence of the obligation to pay insurance proceeds. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable and the judgment is justifiable, and thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow