1. As to the Korean Commercial Arbitration case No. 1311-0151, which is an incorporated association between the Plaintiff and the Defendants.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Under the former Special Act on the Development of Traditional Markets and the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), the status of the parties concerned (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a reconstruction association established for the purpose of promoting a reconstruction project of A located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”). The Plaintiff is a co-sureties of Defendant B, C, D, E, and F (hereinafter “Defendant executives”) each of the joint and several suretys of Defendant B, D, E, and F (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”).

B. A contract and arbitration agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants 1) Defendant Union on June 27, 2008, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant Union on the instant project site provided by the Plaintiff and the Defendant Union (hereinafter “H building”).

A) A construction cost of KRW 16,641,480,00 (excluding value-added tax) for the construction period and 24 months from the date on which the actual commencement is possible after approval for commencement of the construction. The construction cost and project expenses were newly constructed as “24 months from the date on which the actual commencement is possible,” and the construction cost and project expenses were entered into a joint project implementation agreement to use the share method appropriated from the sale price of the association members and the general sale price (hereinafter “the first project implementation agreement”). Upon delay in the commencement of the reconstruction project of this case, the Defendant Union and the Plaintiff entered into a construction contract with the same construction cost as the first project implementation agreement on February 17, 2009, under the premise that the Plaintiff is a contractor who is not a joint project executor, for which 27 months have passed from the date of commencement of the construction period, and on April 6, 2011, the construction period was modified (hereinafter “third modified contract”) under each joint and several surety of the Defendant executives

This Agreement is to supplement and modify the content of the construction contract and the special terms and conditions of the construction contract concluded on February 17, 2009 by the Defendant Union (hereinafter referred to as “A”) and the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “B”).