(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.10.10 2019고단1139

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.10.10 2019고단1139

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On November 8, 2018, the Defendant driven the said vehicle with a blood alcohol level of 0.142% 0.15%, and was driving the said vehicle in the direction of the two-lane driving distance from the two-lane driving in the direction of the two-lane driving distance to the two-way driving distance in the direction of the two-lane driving along the four-lane road in front of the two-lane driving distance to the two-lane driving in the direction of the two-lane driving in the direction of the two-way driving distance, and was driving in the direction of the two-lane driving in the direction of the two-way driving distance, and was driving in the direction of the two-way driving distance to the right-hand driving right-hand side of the vehicle driven by the victim D (Nam, 33 years old) who stops in the atmosphere to the right-hand left-hand edge of the said vehicle.

The Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc. in the string that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim F (hereinafter 25 years of age) who was accompanied by the said rocketing car, suffered injury to the victim G (V) who was accompanied by the said rocketing car in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and suffered injury to the said rocketing car in need of medical treatment on the part of the victim G (V 1 years of age), including field festivals and boundary symptoms, etc., for about two weeks of medical treatment, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as extinguishing the said Ra car by immediately stopping it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. A medical certificate (three cases);

1. Written estimate;

1. A taxi boomor video CD for a witness driver;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel at the scene of the accident alleged that there was no intention to commit a crime of escape because the Defendant did not recognize the fact of the traffic accident. However, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, namely, the Defendant’s vehicle is twice the damaged vehicle in front of the vehicle.

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.06.10 2015고단321

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2020.01.30 2019고단1034

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.11.18 2016고단969

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.02 2015고단5162

-제주지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단1080