logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2015.12.22 2015가단16378
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 700,000 and annual interest thereon from April 22, 2015 to December 22, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a director of C, and the defendant is an employee of the same company.

B. On April 22, 2015, around 19:40, the Defendant, at the E funeral hall located in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, issued a provision on the franchisium’s license, and she saw the Plaintiff into a table, and she saw the Plaintiff as “nicking the Plaintiff,” and then, the Plaintiff was injured by the Plaintiff at the 1st century (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

C. The Defendant was indicted with the instant injury and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000.

(Reasons for Recognition) The fact that there is no dispute over the Seoul District Court's Ansan Branch's 2015 High Court's Busan High Court's 2015 High Court's 867. [Grounds for Recognition], the entries in Gap's 1 through

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition that the damages occurred, since the defendant committed a tort causing the injury of this case to the plaintiff, it is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages suffered by the plaintiff.

B. 1) The Plaintiff’s claims claim amounting to KRW 30,00,000 for compensation for damages incurred from the instant injury to the Defendant. 2) The Plaintiff sought a payment of consolation money amounting to KRW 700,000,00 in consideration of various circumstances revealed in the pleadings of the instant case, including the Plaintiff’s relationship with the Plaintiff and the Defendant; the background and degree of the instant injury; the Plaintiff was assaulted at a large number of people; and the Plaintiff did not separately seek property damages, such as medical expenses.

C. According to the theory of lawsuit, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay at each rate of KRW 700,000 and 15% per annum under the Civil Act until December 22, 2015, which is the date of this judgment, from April 22, 2015, which is the date of this judgment, to the date of full payment.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's objection.

arrow