All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is unreasonable because each of the punishments of the original judgment (one year of imprisonment, and eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendants recognized their mistake and reflect the Defendants; (b) the amount of damage is relatively small; (c) Defendant B was aware that the victim did not want the punishment against the said Defendant by mutual consent with the victim; (d) Defendant A had the record of having been sentenced to criminal punishment at least five times, including the same criminal record and the criminal record; (b) Defendant B committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime resulting from the instant crime; (c) Defendant B had the record of having been sentenced at least seven times, including the criminal record and the criminal record of the same kind for the past two years; (d) again committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime resulting from the same crime; and (e) taking into account the Defendants’ age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, family relationship, economic situation, and all other matters concerning the sentencing specified in the records and changes of the instant case, and thus, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.