1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. At the time of the instant accident, at around 9:30 on November 5, 2016, at the time of the instant accident, the Defendant’s vehicle in the location of the fourth-lane collision with the Olympic Games near the two-lane in Yeongdeungpo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul at the location on November 5, 2016, was driving in the vicinity of the two-lanes by moving the four-lane to the four-lanes as the Olympic Games in the Han Riverside as the Olympic Games. However, at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle entered the Olympic Games as the first half of the Plaintiff’s vehicle with the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the Defendant’s vehicle as the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the vehicle, and caused injuries such as spine, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”), the payment amount of insurance money paid to the Defendant vehicle more than 40,690,560 won (E medical expenses and the payment date of insurance money, etc.) and evidence No. 2017 through 2817/328/320

2. According to the above fact finding that the driver of the plaintiff vehicle has a duty of care to safely enter the vehicle after the passage of the vehicle, while driving the vehicle into the scam on the scam through the scam and driving the Olympic Games, it is reasonable to view that the driver of the plaintiff vehicle caused the accident of this case while trying to combine the vehicle with the four-lanes while neglecting the duty of care to safely enter the vehicle after the passage of the vehicle.

Furthermore, due to the instant accident, the part on the left side of the front driver’s vehicle and the part on the right side of the Defendant vehicle were destroyed. Considering such damage side and the length of the Defendant vehicle, the Defendant vehicle appears to have been driving ahead of the Plaintiff vehicle. The Defendant vehicle driver who was driving ahead of the Plaintiff vehicle is the Defendant vehicle.