Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Although the Defendants were not a person handling psychotropic drugs as a foreigner of their own nationality, they treated psychotropic drugs as follows:

1. On September 24, 2018, the Defendants, at around September 24, 2018, dypon medication, dyponism at the Defendant D’s residence located in the e in the ethical City of Sep. 24, 2018.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to administer philophones.

2. On January 5, 2019, Defendant D purchased and sold phiphones and administered the phiphones, around January 5, 2019, received KRW 90,000 in cash from Defendant A, B, and C in his/her dwelling place in the lusium E at the lusium around 21:50 on January 5, 2019. The Defendants continued to put the lusium in the lusium, including phiphones traded at around 22:0 on the same day, and dump caused a delay by heating the lusiums.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to sell and administer philophones and administered them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. A report on investigation (calculated additional charges);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of each request for appraisal (general appraisal), delivery (C reproduction), delivery (A, B, and D respectively);

1. Defendants: Imprisonment with prison labor under Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 (3) (b), Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants: The proviso of Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act; and

1. Defendants of the order of provisional payment: The fact that the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are against the recognition of the instant crime, the frequency and quantity of the medication of chophones.