logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.10.10 2019나4479
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers), the plaintiff is a company engaged in the static, hot wave manufacturing and wholesale business, and the defendant is an individual engaged in drieder, steel structure manufacturing and wholesale business under the trade name of "C". Upon the defendant's request, the plaintiff supplied the due date during the period from October 18, 2016 to May 10, 2018 by setting the electric temperature and the printing team, etc. as the 30th day of the pertinent month after the supply of goods, and the balance of unpaid goods as of September 22, 2018 is KRW 8,223,559 (including value-added tax).

According to the facts of recognition as above, the defendant was promulgated on May 21, 2019 and enforced on June 1, 2019 pursuant to Article 2 (2) of the Addenda of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, etc., which was the date following the date of payment for KRW 8,223,559, the balance of the unpaid goods payment claim, and the date of payment for which the copy of the complaint in this case was served to the defendant as requested by the plaintiff, and the former provisions on the statutory interest rate in the main sentence of Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, etc., which was promulgated on May 21, 2019 and enforced on June 1, 2019, apply to the case for which the first instance trial was not concluded at the time of the enforcement of the above Decree pursuant to Article 2 (2) of

shall be liable to pay damages for delay calculated in proportion to the ratio of such damages.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim should be accepted as reasonable.

As such, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow