beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each of the statements in Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 5-1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 6 and 7, Gap evidence 8-1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 1, 3, Eul evidence 4-1, 2, 3, and Eul evidence 5 can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings. A.
The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Defendant B with the land for the off-gu, Sincheon-gu, Seoul. However, on June 12, 2012, the division was divided into 1471.8 square meters of the land for the off-gu, Sincheon-gu (hereinafter “instant land”), 552.1 square meters of the D factory site (hereinafter “instant 2 land”), and E factory site, 99.8 square meters of land for the off-gu, Sincheon-gu, Seoul. Since the land category of the instant E land was changed to a road, E was 9.8 square meters of a road (hereinafter “instant 3 land”).
B. On May 2, 2012, the Plaintiff was a licensed real estate agent operating real estate brokerage business under the trade name of “G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” in the Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan. The Defendant Boan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) concluded a sales contract with the Plaintiff on May 2, 2012, to purchase KRW 24.95 square meters of the instant land and its ground buildings and the instant land No. 3 from Defendant B in the purchase price of KRW 1,90,000,000.
C. On August 23, 2012, the Defendant Company completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant Company on the ground of the above sale on May 2, 2012, 2012, with respect to the instant land No. 2 and its ground buildings and the instant land No. 3, 24.95/998 shares, and paid KRW 17,00,000 to the Plaintiff as commission for the said brokerage. Defendant B paid KRW 18,810,000 to the Plaintiff.
On the other hand, the three-story factories of the general steel structure, sand site location panel, etc. on the ground of the instant land No. 1 were also registered to preserve ownership in the name of Defendant B, but the Defendant Company decided to purchase from Defendant B the part of the instant land No. 1 and its ground and the three-story factories, which were not previously purchased on April 23, 2013 following the conclusion of the said sales contract.