logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.03.30 2016가단2287
토지인도 및 지상물철거 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the 92 square meters of C forest land in Chungcheongnam-si, the attached reference table 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 19, 20, 23, 1.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of C forest land 92 square meters and D forest land 95 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and the Defendant is the owner of 457 square meters in Chungcheongnam-si.

B. Each land of this case shall be 13 square meters on the ground of the attached Table 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 19, 20, 23, and 1 of the information listed in the attached Table 20, 21, 22, 23, and 20 in order to connect each point of the part of the ship connected to each point of 13 square meters on the ground, referring to the attached Table 20, 21, 22, 23, and 20; 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 7 of the information listed in the Defendant’s ownership, and shall be 1,61 square meters on the ground of the attached Table 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 27, and 20 on the ground; 15, 361,4.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5 (including each number), the result of the request for surveying and appraisal to the head of the Chungcheong branch office of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the defendant, barring special circumstances, has a duty to remove each of the facilities of this case, which was installed upon the plaintiff's intrusion on each of the land of this case owned by the plaintiff, and to deliver the land of this case Ga, Na, and Ra as indicated

B. The Defendant alleged that the land of this case was purchased on May 14, 13 by the Defendant’s husband F, and that G transferred its ownership to the Plaintiff as a payment for the construction expenses incurred against the Plaintiff’s husband H, while the registration of the wife was not completed. However, the sales contract was concluded.

Even if the registration of ownership transfer is not completed.

arrow