beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. Fraud;
A. On December 2, 2016, the Defendant is required to take two mobile phones in order to have B perform Internet shopping mall in which “A punishment is imposed” to the victim C by telephone from the first place of police.
A. The mobile phone charges were made to make a false statement to the effect that “A will have to terminate four (3) months after he/she paid the mobile phone charges.”
However, in fact, the defendant tried to use the cell phone from the injured party for the operation of the Internet shopping mall, and only intended to dispose of the cell phone as a "large phone", and did not have an intent to pay the telephone fee.
In such a situation, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was issued two mobile phones (the total sum of KRW 2,058,400, and KRW 1,029,200, and KRW 72,02, and KRW 1,029,200, respectively) to the victim from around that time.
B. In December 2016, the Defendant shall not have money to pay a fine to the victim C by insurance fraud.
D. D. The loan will be limited to 6 million won if D. The loan will be extended to four million won.
Since the Internet shopping mall is operated in Korea, all loans can be repaid after three months.
The term "to provide KRW 400,000 with loans by the value of two months in advance."
However, the defendant did not operate the Internet shopping mall and did not have any special property at the time, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the money.
In this regard, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was delivered 6 million won as the borrowed money from the victim around that time.
(c)
In December 2016, the Defendant defrauded the mobile phone one, and the victim C is lacking in money in the nearest areas of the subway No. 5 subway lines around December 2016, and there is a difference between only one mobile phone and one another. The mobile phone charges, etc. were made false.
However, the defendant's cellular phone received from the injured party.