logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.06.27 2019고단715
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 24, 2018, from around 23:00 to 23:40 of the same day, Defendant A’s sole crime committed the following acts: (a) from the main point of “E” in the operation of the victim D (Inn, 50 years of age) located in Cheongju-gu and Cheongdong-gu, E (E) with the victim D (the victim D (E) who was on the Cheongju-si; and (b) on the other hand, the Defendant took a bath to F, who is an employee, and (c) took a walk.

Accordingly, the defect that men in the above B and name in question want to see the defendant and see out of the main point, and the defendant laid off the table to the outside of the main point and laid off the table to the outside, string off the table, string off the table table, an abrupting with an abrupting with an abrupting and drinking, and continued to be out of the main point, and humped at the entrance of the main point.

In this respect, the defendant damaged the victim's property whose market price is unknown, and obstructed the victim's main business by force.

2. On November 24, 2018, at around 23:40, the Defendants were subject to the 112 report from the victim H (36 years old), a slope belonging to the G District in the Cheongju-gu Police Station G District, Cheongju-gu, which called “E” to the effect that the two descendants fright at the outside corridor of the said “E”, and the Defendants were subject to the act of disturbance as described in the preceding paragraph from the victim H (36 years old) who was called out, and the Defendant B saw the victim’s bat, with the victim’s patrol bat, etc., cut down once. Defendant A spited the victim’s bat on the back of the back of the victim’s face. Defendant A spited the victim’s face in the process of continuously arresting the victim in the course of obstruction of the performance of official duties.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning H’s 112 declaration processing and arrest of flagrant offenders, which is a police officer, and, at the same time, jointly committed an injury to the above victim, such as a brudum base that requires treatment for about 20 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each of the Defendants’ names.

arrow