The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant violated the code of practice of a person who carries on the amusement business affecting the public morals by displaying the maternity flag, which is obscene, at the C adult product shop operated by the Defendant in Gwangju Northern-gu, around June 28, 2013, at around 16:45.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, the Defendant’s store is a place where the Defendant sells goods to assist the sexual life of adults, and the Defendant’s use of the goods displayed is a male self-help organization, and its shape and color is not a detailed re-explosion, but a rough expression degree, it is difficult to view the Defendant’s display of goods displayed for the purpose of selling them for the purpose of selling them. However, in light of the following circumstances, the Defendant’s shop is a place where the Defendant sells goods to assist the sexual life of adults, namely, the Defendant’s shop is a place where the entry of juveniles is prohibited, and the use of the goods displayed by the Defendant is a male self-defense organization, and its shape and color is not a simple re-explosion of women’s sexual flag, anus part, and it is difficult to view it as constituting “obscenity goods” where the display of goods displayed by the Defendant is prohibited for the

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, and thus, the judgment of innocence is rendered under the latter part of Article 325