All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Improper sentencing for each of the reasons for appeal;

2. The lower court determined that the instant crime was committed against many unspecified persons in a systematic, planned, and intelligent manner, and that part of the total crime was involved in the social and economic harm of the crime.

Even if the liability for the crime is less severe

In light of the unfavorable circumstances, the defendant recognized the crime of this case, agreed with the victims, and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment except for the punishment of a fine of 200,000 won due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act around December 1994, the sentence was determined (one year of imprisonment) by taking into account the following factors: the scope of the recommended punishment under the sentencing guidelines, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.

The grounds for each unfair sentencing alleged by the defendant and the prosecutor are shown to have been sufficiently considered in determining the punishment against the defendant, and the above sentencing conditions have changed otherwise.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

All the arguments of the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.