logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.11.24 2016고정1171
협박
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who resides in the same apartment floor, such as the victim C and the victim D, who is a married couple.

The Defendant, around May 13, 2016, on the ground that the victims of the Bupyeong-si E Apartment 408 desire and criticizes themselves, stated that the victims of the Bupyeongcheon-si E Apartment 408 were “I will have been in fluencing, or do not go against.” Durings, there is a limit to inside. When the between the two parties is followed, I will bluscing off the bluscing. Bluscing the bluscing of the bluscing of the bluscing of the bluscing of the bluscing of the bluscing of the bluscing of the bluscing of the bluscing of the cD apartment, and sent the documents to the victims through the post office for proof of the content.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. The criminal defendant asserts that he/she has no intention to send the content of this case to oppose a victim of harassment, or that he/she constitutes self-defense. In the crime of intimidation under Article 283 of the Criminal Act, the term "Intimidation" notifies the other party of the harm sufficient to cause fear to the other party. The determination of whether it constitutes a threat of harm should be made by comprehensively taking into account the various circumstances before and after the act, such as the offender and the other party's tendency, surrounding circumstances at the time of notification, relationship between the offender and the other party, status, and degree of friendship (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do1489, Feb. 18, 2016; the defendant and the injured party from around 2011 to the apartment management issues, etc.; and the content certification of this case sent by the defendant.

arrow