1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1 million for each of the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the appointed parties; and (b) from April 13, 2015 to June 22, 2016.

1. In fact, the defendant is the head of the child-care center operating the F Child-Care Center in Ulsan-gu E.

The plaintiff and the designated parties have started to enter the child-care center operated by the defendant from October to March 2014.

From October 2014 to January 2015, the Defendant provided the Plaintiff and the designated parties with food using funging or malodoring maximum materials five times in child care centers.

The Defendant was prosecuted on charges of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Child Abuse Crimes by providing the Plaintiff and the designated parties with my myico or maximum food as above through the provision of the Plaintiff and the designated parties with a meal service or a simple food, thereby neglecting the basic protection of their own meal services, thereby violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Child Abuse Crimes, and was convicted of the Defendant on February 15, 2016.

(2015 Madan1865) The defendant's conviction was finally affirmed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 8 to 14, 17 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The judgment of the court below is clear in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff and the designated parties provided maximum food to the plaintiff and the designated parties who are the principal of the child-care center, who were not upper, even though they provided the plaintiff and the designated parties with food not upper.

Therefore, the defendant has a duty to pay consolation money for mental distress to the plaintiff and the designated parties.

In full view of the age, relationship between the Plaintiff and the designated parties, the relationship between the Defendant and the Defendant, the specific contents, method, and period of the instant act in which the Defendant provided maximum food, and other various circumstances revealed in the pleadings of this case, the amount of consolation money to be paid to the Plaintiff and the designated parties shall be determined as KRW 1 million each.

3. Conclusion: (a) The Defendant: (b) one million won for consolation money and one million won for each of the Plaintiff and the designated parties; and (c) on April 13, 2015, the day following the delivery date of the instant complaint sought by the Plaintiff.