1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B delivers a building listed in the separate sheet;

B. Defendant C shall enter the attached list.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the facts constituting the grounds for the claim in the separate sheet and the local land expropriation committee of Busan Metropolitan City rendered a ruling of expropriation of KRW 33,250,000 with respect to the building listed in the separate sheet on July 14, 2014; and the compensation for losses at KRW 33,250,000 with respect to the building listed in the separate sheet, and the Plaintiff’s deposit the above compensation for losses with the Busan District Court Decision No. 6565 on September 4, 2014 may be recognized, and there is no counter-proof.

B. Article 49(6) of the Act on the Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Act on the Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc.”) provides that “When a public announcement of an authorized management and disposal plan is made, a right holder, such as the owner of the previous land or structure, shall not use or benefit from the previous land or structure until the date of public announcement of relocation under Article 54, but the same shall not apply to a right holder whose compensation for losses under Article 40 of the Act on the Acquisition of Land,

Meanwhile, according to the Public Works Act applicable mutatis mutandis to the expropriation or use of ownership of land or buildings for implementing a rearrangement project and other rights in an improvement zone pursuant to Article 40(1) of the Urban Improvement Act, a project operator shall acquire ownership of land or goods on the commencement date of expropriation determined by the competent Land Tribunal by adjudication (Article 45(1)), pay or deposit compensation adjudicated by the Land Tribunal by the commencement date of expropriation (Article 40(1) and (2). If a project operator fails to pay or deposit compensation by the commencement date of expropriation, the adjudication shall lose its effect (Article 42(1)), but once there has been an objection against the expropriation ruling or an administrative litigation.