1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The defendant is Daegu District Court with respect to 11,504 square meters of forest land in Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun.

1. The reasoning of the judgment by the court of first instance is as follows, except for the part presented between the third and fourth of the judgment by the court of first instance, and the part presented between the third and fourth of the judgment by the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the entry of the judgment by the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420

2. Parts to be dried;

C. 1) Determination on the extinctive prescription is reasonable in regard to the registration of creation of each of the instant collateral units. In light of the following facts: (a) the Defendant became a mortgagee of a right to collateral security and the obligor on November 29, 2004; and (b) the overall purport of the entries and arguments in the evidence No. 3, No. 2-1, No. 2-3, and No. 2-1, No. 2-2, and No. 3, it is reasonable to regard the claim secured by each of the instant collateral units as the claim secured by the Defendant’s acquisition of the above debt amounting to KRW 28,00,000 as the claim secured by the Defendant’s acquisition of the above debt amounting to KRW 4. In light of the following evidence, it is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the period of repayment of the above collateral was transferred on December 31, 2005; and (c) there is no other evidence to acknowledge the credibility of the claim secured by the Defendant on the ground that the aforementioned claim was extinguished by evidence and evidence No.24.