logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.07.04 2019고단560
사기방조
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On October 2018, the person who was unaware of the facts charged sent a text message to the effect that the Defendant would be given a loan to the Defendant at the first place of police officers, and that the Defendant would receive the text message and make a false bank transaction performance and would have made a loan to him/her contact, and the Defendant would withdraw the deposit in cash and deliver it to the employees in default. The Defendant knowingly accepted the foregoing fact that the money transferred may have been acquired as a crime, and then notified the account holder in the name of the Defendant (C) in the name of the Defendant.

On October 23, 2018, on the part of 10:44 on October 23, 2018, the name-free person misrepresented the victim D with a telephone to check the Seoul Central District Inspection Inspection, and made a false statement that “I will return money to the designated account, once he/she has to check whether the new account was used for a crime, and whether the party is involved in a crime, and once he/she has to transfer money deposited in the new account to the designated account.”

However, there was no intention to return the money to the victim because the above person under whose name the money was transferred from the victim was thought to immediately withdraw it.

Nevertheless, the above person who was unaware of name was accused of the victim and was transferred to the above B Bank account in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

On October 23, 2018, the Defendant released 19 million won deposited in the said account at the point south of the 2018 branch of the B bank, according to the horses, if the Defendant sent money from the person who was unable to obtain a loan to the lower account, to the lower account, and then deliver the money to us.

As a result, the Defendant, even though he was aware of the fact that the Defendant, who was unaware of the name, was deceiving the victim to commit the singishing, assisted the Defendant to commit the singishing by withdrawing the amount of damages as above.

2. Determination.

arrow