logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.14 2017고단6642
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On August 201, 201, the Defendant against the victim E is carrying on the Defendant’s Montreal business in the center of the victim E’s office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, with the victim “in the Republic of Korea, in Japan and Hong, the Republic of Korea is carrying on the Defendant’s Lmond business, and there is a large amount of profit.

A false statement was made to the effect that the project would return it to a large amount of profit, along with the principal, if it is lent funds for the project.

However, the Defendant did not engage in the Montreal business in Japan and Hong Congo. Rather, the Defendant thought that most of the loaned money was used as living expenses, entertainment expenses, etc., and the Defendant did not have any income source, but did not have any intent or ability to complete the loan even if he borrowed money in the absence of any special property under the name of the Defendant.

On October 10, 201, the Defendant received from the injured party a cash of KRW 269,000,000,000 from the office of the said injured party as a loan, in cash, from the office of the said injured party.

B. Around June 2013, the Defendant against the victim G was committing a clothing business in the nearest area of I apartment house 1203, which is the victim G located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim “in Korea, is running a clothing business in Japan, and is paying a large amount of profit.

The phrase “to return the above project as a larger profit, along with the principal,” was false when lending funds for the project.

However, the defendant did not operate the clothing business in Japan, and he thought that most of the borrowed money would be used as living expenses, entertainment expenses, etc., and the defendant did not have a certain income source, and even if he borrowed money without any special property under the name of the defendant, he did not have any intention or ability to complete the payment.

Around June 19, 2013, the Defendant received 100 million won in cash from the damaged party, under the name of the borrowed money, at the place where the said victim’s residence was located.

(c)

On May 2012, the Defendant against the Victim J was at the 7th floor D care room in K, which is the residence of the victim J, under the trend of Red Sea Spe on May 2012.

arrow